NEW

God vs Science

This is an edited extract from Can Science Explain Everything? by John C Lennox (January 2019). The book is the first of a series in a joint venture with the Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics, Zacharias Institute, and The Good Book Company. “Surely you can’t be...

Objection Overruled

By William A. Dembski & Sean McDowell This article first appeared in the Christian Research Journal, volume 31, number 5 (2008). For further information or to subscribe to the Christian Research Journal go to: http://www.equip.org. Synopsis The controversy...

A “Sign” of the Times

So sorry rabbi… Recently a friend of mine gave me a short clip out of a local newspaper to read (see below) and asked my opinion about what it said.  My friend knows that I’m a Christian and where I stand on issues of faith, but I think he was trying to get me to see...

Starting a Grassroots Apologetics Ministry

Starting an Apologetic Ministry I had the privilege of speaking with Chris Arnzen of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio about the birth of New York Apologetics and how to start an apologetics ministry.  We know that "unless the Lord builds it, it's laborers labor in vain", so...

Beware the Hebrew Roots Movement

Hebrew Roots is dangerous! In my recent radio interview with Chris Arnzen on the Iron Sharpens Iron Radio Show, I was asked a question about the Hebrew Roots movement.  Although I've heard about the movement and knew some basic information, I promised to post some...

Who was Jesus? | NY Minute

We're using the "Handbook of Apologetics" by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli to go over the arguments for the existence of God.  Today, we will be covering the above referenced subject in relation to the existence of God. Dr. Kreeft teaches logic in two major...

The Deity of Jesus: the alternative | NY Minute

We're using the "Handbook of Apologetics" by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli to go over the arguments for the existence of God.  Today, we will be covering the above referenced subject in relation to the existence of God. Dr. Kreeft teaches logic in two major...

Jesus’ Divinity leads to Trustworthiness | NY Minute

We're using the "Handbook of Apologetics" by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli to go over the arguments for the existence of God.  Today, we will be covering the above referenced subject in relation to the existence of God. Dr. Kreeft teaches logic in two major...

Divinity of Jesus Difficulties | NY Minute

We're using the "Handbook of Apologetics" by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli to go over the arguments for the existence of God.  Today, we will be covering the above referenced subject in relation to the existence of God. Dr. Kreeft teaches logic in two major...

Evolution: Science Fable, or fact?

This hilarious video on evolution illustrates the absurdity of the Theory of Evolution and the consequences that follow.  On evolution, you have no significant value or meaning.  

 

“The Bible is full of contradictions”

 

That’s an often shouted battle cry for most skeptics.  Another similar question continually asked is “How can you say the bible is God’s inerrant and infallible word when there are so many contradictions throughout its pages?”.   Even though that claim has been met head on and refuted several times over, skeptics still persist.  

If true, the bible is full of contradictions that would disqualify it from being inerrant and infallible and therefore we should not trust it.  Worse, it can’t be considered a word from God.

                                             So, Whattaya Do?

 

 

Ask a question:  Do you know the difference between a contradictory account and a complimentary account?

 

For an account in the bible to be contradictory it must violate the law of non-contradiction.  

For example: if the scriptures said that Jesus was crucified and died, and in another place it said Jesus wasn’t crucified and didn’t die, that would be a contradiction.  

The scriptures never contradict themselves.

 

For an account in the to be complimentary it would have to be either more descriptive or less descriptive about the same account.  For example, in Mark 16 and Luke 24 both writers describe the empty tomb the Sunday after Jesus was buried.  Mark mentions seeing one angel, and Luke mentions seeing two. Is that a contradiction?  No!  

It’s quite possible, and probable, that the eyewitness’ are explaining what they saw that day from their vantage point.  One person saw both angels, the other saw just one.  The point is that the details do not contradict each other, they compliment each other.

 

To Illustrate

This is how a detective pieces together a story when investigating a crime.  They interview all the people who were nearby and ask what they saw.  Some saw the crime directly, some saw it from other angles, and some saw nothing at all.  One witness sees a man robbing a bank.  Another witness sees two men running out of the bank, jumping into a car and driving away.  And the last person doesn’t see anything at all.   Oh no!  That’s three different stories!

Does this mean the stories contradict each other?  No, they’re complimentary.  The detective uses all the clues to piece together a full picture of what really happened that day.  It’s actually a better description of what took place because of all the complimentary accounts.  The same is true of the bible.

 

Suffice it to say that the bible does not have any contradictory accounts in it.  They are complimentary accounts that help us better understand what actually took place at that time.

 

So, now you know Whattaya Do.  That was easy.

 

Share This: